|
NEWS
DR. ANDRÁS ANTALFFY-ZSÍROS Electrical engineer, lawyer, an associate of the Danubia Patent and Law Office, for his high-level industrial property protection activities pursued with regard to the legal protection of computer-assisted inventions and computerised programme creations, as well as for his contribution to numerous successful innovations.
|
|
|
|
Archive
PARTIAL BAD-FAITH REGISTRATION REQUIRES TOTAL CANCELLATION
Following modifications to the Code of Civil Procedure, a new Metropolitan Appeal Court level has been created. These appellate courts have taken over a number of the appeal court functions of the Supreme Court.
LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS OF THE INNOVATION SYSTEM OF THE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION
The development of the European integration from the European Coal and Steal Community to the EU has led to the establishing of several post-national institutions which have contributed significantly to shaping the innovation process in the Member St
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN HUNGARY
When a few months ago I accepted the invitation of the organizing committee of our Congress to take part in the work of our workshop as a speaker, resp. as a person being professionally active mainly in patent litigation cases.
Downloadable version: Molnár Imre 2003.pdf
2003-09-04, APPI-MIE International Conference
THE COMMUNITY TRADE MARK AND THE ACCESSION OF HUNGARY TO THE EU
On 9 October 2002, the EC Commission issued a report in which it considered that ten new countries should be invited to join the EU in January 2004. The countries invited to join were Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary,...
Downloadable version: Szigeti Éva 2003.pdf
2003-01-21, Kitzbuehel
MAIN FEATURES OF THE AMENDED HUNGARIAN PATENT ACT
Hungary became a member of the EPC on January 1, 2003. The main legal effect of this fact is that following this date a European patent can be claimed and granted with an effect which also extends to the territory of the Republic of Hungary.
Downloadable version: Palágyi Tivadar 2003.pdf
2003-01-01, AIPPI Proceedings of the Hungarian Group
DEVELOPMENT OF THE INSTITUTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HUNGARY’S NSI (NATIONAL SYSTEM OF INNOVATION)
At the end of the 1980s Hungary – like other Central Eastern European countries – spent 2% of its GDP of about USD 3,000 per person on R&D expenditures, and fell in the category of countries with “relatively high” expenditure on innovation considerin
Downloadable version: Molnár István 2003.pdf
2003-01-01, AIPPI Proceedings of the Hungarian Group
IS IT POSSIBLE TO ENFORCE PATENT RIGHTS IN HUNGARY FROM AN ORIGINATOR’S POINT OF VIEW?
I wish to give an account of my recent experiences gained in a direct or indirect way during enforcing the patent rights of the originators. I do not wish to answer the above question myself, I would rather leave it to the readers.
COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE INTA GUIDELINES FOR TRADEMARK EXAMINATION AND THE PRACTICE
The INTA guidelines set out the scope of examination and the standards of criteria on the basis of which the examinations shall be conducted, and substantially defined the principles according to which Trademark Registration Offices shall operate.
Downloadable version: Szigeti Éva 2001.pdf
2001-01-01, Hungarian Trademark News
THE PATENT ATTORNEY PROFESSION IN HUNGARY AFTER EPC RATIFICATION
We live in a period of complex ideas transmitted digitally over the internet, and so we must co-operate in order to have a system to protect innovators in this new environment.
Downloadable version: Palágyi Tivadar 2000.pdf
2000-01-01, AIPPI Proceedings of the Hungarian Group
REQUIREMENTS OF PATENTABILITY
Sec. (1) of the Patent Act of 1995 defines the conditions for patentability similarly to those provided by Article 1 of the 3rd Strasbourg Agreement as well as Article 52 of the European Patent Convention1 by stating that any invention that is new, i
Downloadable version: Palágyi Tivadar 1996.pdf
1996-01-01, AIPPI Proceedings of the Hungarian Group
THE CASE HISTORY OF A MULTI-PARTY INFRINGEMENT SUIT IN HUNGARY
In addition to a foreign patentee, who had Hungarian patents and was represented by the authors, four companies were involved in the subject legal dispute; two were Hungarian companies, the other two were companies from a third country.
Downloadable version: Sikos_Róbert_1991.pdf
1991-01-01, APPI Proceedings of the Hungarian Group
|
|
|
